Welcome!

Apache Authors: Nikita Ivanov, Yeshim Deniz, Amy Lindberg, Jim Kaskade, Jayaram Krishnaswamy

Related Topics: Virtualization, SOA & WOA, .NET, Apache

Virtualization: Blog Post

Implementing Hyper-V Network Virtualization in Windows Server 2012

New virtualized network capabilities provide true network and VM portability

What is Hyper-V Network Virtualization?

Any Service, Any Server, Any Data Center or Cloud!

True network and virtual machine portability - that's the ultimate goal of Hyper-V Network Virtualization - allowing you, as an IT Pro, to align changing business needs with the best physical resource locations to run your VMs and network services - easily, without the sweeping network, router, switch, firewall and DNS changes with which we'd traditionally be plagued when merely attempting the feat of relocating VMs to a new rack, subnet or data center ... WOW!

Windows Server 2012 and our FREE Hyper-V Server 2012 include a new network virtualization feature that permits the configuration of "software-defined networking (SDN)" within the native Hyper-V hypervisor.  Hyper-V Network Virtualization extends the virtualization benefits we've realized when virtualizing server workloads into the network layer to decouple our physical network infrastructure from logical layer-2 and layer-3 subnets as illustrated below:

Sounds Interesting! But, Why Use Hyper-V Network Virtualization Instead of Traditional VLANs?

Hyper-V Network Virtualization was intended to address the limitations and complexity seen in typical environments using VLANs, such as:

  • Limited scalability - typical network switch configurations permit only 1,000 VLANs out of a maximum of 4,094 VLAN IDs.  In contrast, Hyper-V Network Virtualization can scale to support over 16 million virtualized networks.
  • Configuration cost and complexity - environments using many VLANs need to carefully manage VLAN configurations on each switch, host and virtual machine to ensure a consistent experience.  In addition, enterprise VLAN configurations can require network switches with advanced processing capabilities from a single hardware vendor, often times making it difficult to cost effectively expand virtual network capacity.  Hyper-V Network Virtualization can be centrally implemented via network virtualization policies across a diverse network switch infrastructure and does not require special capabilities in the underlying network hardware.
  • Constrained to a single subnet - Traditional VLANs are constrained to a single subnet, and although VLANs can be extended across physical sites, they must stretch one subnet at the network layer across those physical locations, which can cause extreme routing challenges - particularly when trying to leverage a combination of private data center resources along with hosted or public cloud resources.  Hyper-V Network Virtualization can present virtualized networks across diverse IP networks that extend across private, hosted and public cloud resources.

By removing these limitations, Hyper-V Network Virtualization extends the value of virtualization features that rely on network configurations.  As a I discuss these capabilities with IT Pros at our IT Camp events, three of the new scenarios that they are really excited about include:

  1. Cross-subnet Live Migration of Virtual Machines - Live migrate running virtual machines to Hyper-V hosts on a different physical network subnet!  Hyper-V Network Virtualization extends virtualized subnets across one or more physical IP subnets, allowing Live Migration to be used across physical subnet boundaries. 

    Note: Cross-subnet Live Migration with Hyper-V Network Virtualization requires the use of Hyper-V over SMB 3.0 to provide shared VM storage to Hyper-V hosts on each physical subnet.  Hyper-V over SMB 3.0 uses cost effective file shares on Windows Server 2012 to provide a shared storage location that each Hyper-V can access for running and live migrating virtual machines.
  2. IP Address and VM Portability across subnets and premises - As business needs change, re-locate VMs to any datacenter, hosting provider or public cloud location WITHOUT changing the existing IP Addresses of the VMs! Today, numerous configuration choices are tied to the IP Address of each virtual machine - physical datacenter location, firewall rules, router ACLs, directory services roles, etc - and this can make changing the IP Address of a deployed virtual machine a painful process.  As a result, many shops find that it's difficult to move VMs new host locations - such as new datacenter, hosted or public cloud locations - as business needs change, because these moves would generally require IP Address changes - not so with Hyper-V Network Virtualization!
  3. Multi-tenancy with Overlapping IP Address ranges - This is a great solution for Hosting Providers, who need to ensure that each customer's collection of virtual machines are completely isolated at a network layer from other customers.  Each virtualized network can also use the customer's native IP addressing scheme, even if it would normally conflict with IP addressing schemes used by other customers.

How Does Hyper-V Network Virtualization Work?
Hyper-V Network Virtualization is implemented in Windows Server 2012 and Hyper-V Server 2012 as a new network driver module, Windows Network Virtualization (aka "ms_netwnv").  This module can be bound to physical NICs on each server and configured with a set of policies to virtualize network addressing and routing rules.  When configuring network virtualization, two different configuration approaches can be used:

  • Generic Routing Encapsulation (NVGRE) - this approach builds GRE (RFC 2784 and 2890) tunnels between Hyper-V hosts to encapsulate virtualized networks using the details outlined  in the NVGRE Draft RFC document that has been submitted to the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).  This draft RFC document was assembled by a committee of networking veterans that includes senior engineers from Intel, DELL, HP, Emulex, Broadcom and Microsoft.  NVGRE is the preferred configuration approach for most network virtualization scenarios with Hyper-V hosts.
  • IP Address Rewrite (IP Rewrite) - this approach uses a NAT-like approach at each Hyper-V host to rewrite virtualized network addresses to native network addresses that can be routed across the physical network architecture.  IP Rewrite is intended for scenarios where Virtual Machines require extremely high-performance network bandwidth, such as 10 Gbps Ethernet, since traditional NIC offload mechanisms are supported to increase throughput.

Since NVGRE is the preferred choice for most network virtualization scenarios, we'll be focusing on this approach for the reminder of this article.  However, check out this article if you're interested in more details on IP Rewrite and a deeper comparison between the two approaches.

What Changes Are Needed to My Existing Physical Network Switches?
NONE!
NVGRE can both be implemented across an existing physical IP network without requiring changes your physical network switch architecture.  Since NVGRE tunnels terminate at each Hyper-V host, the hosts handle all of the handiwork for encapsulating and de-encapsulating network traffic.  If you have firewalls that are blocking GRE tunnels between sites, you will need to configure your firewalls to support forwarding GRE (IP Protocol 47) tunnel traffic.

Security Note: NVGRE tunnels do not natively provide encryption of payload contents.  If an NVGRE tunnel is being extended across public network segments, I recommend considering IPsec as part of your network layer policies to authenticate and encrypt network traffic end-to-end between virtual machine endpoints.

Performance Note: If you are planning to leverage NVGRE to virtualize heavy network IO workloads, you should also consider network adapter hardware that supports GRE Offload within the network chipset.  Without GRE Offload support within the NIC, traditional NIC offload technologies will not work with GRE traffic.  A number of NICs supporting GRE Offload for Windows Server 2012 and Hyper-V Server 2012 are expected later this calendar year.

I'm Ready! Where Do I Start?
The best starting place is to first layout the addressing scheme for IP addresses and subnets that you'd like to virtualize.  When configuring Hyper-V Network Virtualization, there are two types of IP Addresses that you'll be interacting with:

  • Provider Addresses (PA) - these are unique IP addresses assigned to each Hyper-V host that are routable across the physical network infrastructure.  I like to think of "PA" addresses as "Physical Addresses", because they are assigned to physical Hyper-V hosts.  Each Hyper-V host requires at least one PA to be assigned.
  • Customer Addresses (CA) - these are unique IP addresses assigned to each Virtual Machine that will be participating on a virtualized network.  I like to think of "CA" addresses as "Container Addresses", because they are the IP Addresses assigned to each VM "container" for use by the guest operating system running inside that VM.  Using NVGRE, multiple CA's for VMs running on a Hyper-V host can be tunneled using a single PA on that Hyper-V host.  CA's must be unique across all VMs on the same virtualized network, but CA's do not need to be unique across virtualized networks (such as in multi-tenant scenarios where each customer's VMs are isolated on separate virtualized networks).

Let's look at a simple example of NVGRE with two Hyper-V hosts using PA's and CA's:

In this example, you'll note that each Hyper-V host is assigned one PA address ( e.g., 192.168.x.x ) used for tunneling NVGRE traffic across two physical subnets ( e.g., 192.168.1.x/24 and 192.168.2.x/24 ) on the physical network.  In addition, each VM is assigned a CA address ( e.g., 10.x.x.x ) that is unique within each virtualized network and is tunneled inside the NVGRE tunnel between hosts.

To separate the traffic between the two virtualized networks, the GRE headers on the tunneled packets include a GRE Key that provides a unique Virtual Subnet ID ( e.g., 5001 and 6001 ) for each virtualized network.

Based on this configuration, we have two virtualized networks ( e.g., the "Red" network and the "Blue" network ) that are isolated from one another as separate IP networks and extended across two physical Hyper-V hosts located on two different physical subnets.

Once you have the following defined for your environment in a worksheet, you're ready to move on to the next steps in configuring Hyper-V Network Virtualization:

  • PA's for each Hyper-V Host
  • CA's for each Virtual Machine
  • Virtual Subnet ID's for each subnet to be virtualized

Done! How Can I Configure Hyper-V Network Virtualization?
Hyper-V Network Virtualization policies can be centrally configured using PowerShell 3.0 and PowerShell Remoting for no additional cost.  In addition, System Center 2012 Virtual Machine Manager Service Pack 1, currently available as a public beta, also offers an enterprise GUI management console that can centrally deploy and manage Hyper-V Network Virtualization policies across a large number of Hyper-V hosts.

To understand the configuration steps for each type of virtual network addressing (e.g., PA's, CA's, Virtual Subnet IDs ) described above, let's step through the PowerShell 3.0 Cmdlets used to configure these policies one-by-one.  In these examples, we'll be focusing on the configuration steps for the "Blue" virtual network components on the Hyper-V hosts in the example illustrated above.

Note: If you'll be using System Center 2012 to deploy and manage network virtualization policies as noted above, you won't need to manually run the specific PowerShell 3.0 Cmdlets below because System Center 2012 will run the appropriate PowerShell Cmdlets for you automatically to deploy the policies.  But, it still never hurts to understand what's happening behind the scenes! :-)

Here we go!  Let's get started configuring Hyper-V Network Virtualization via PowerShell 3.0 ...

  1. Enable the Windows Network Virtualization binding on the physical NIC of each Hyper-V Host ( Host 1 and Host 2 )

    Enable-NetAdapterBinding Ethernet -ComponentID ms_netwnv
  2. Configure Blue Subnet Locator and Route records on each Hyper-V Host ( Host 1 and Host 2 )

    New-NetVirtualizationLookupRecord -CustomerAddress "10.1.1.11" -ProviderAddress "192.168.1.10" -VirtualSubnetID "6001" -MACAddress "101010101105" -Rule "TranslationMethodEncap"

    New-NetVirtualizationLookupRecord -CustomerAddress "10.1.1.12" -ProviderAddress "192.168.2.20" -VirtualSubnetID "6001" -MACAddress "101010101107" -Rule "TranslationMethodEncap"

    New-NetVirtualizationCustomerRoute -RoutingDomainID "{11111111-2222-3333-4444-000000000000}" -VirtualSubnetID "6001" -DestinationPrefix "10.1.1.0/24" -NextHop "0.0.0.0" -Metric 255 

    Note:
    In the last command in this step above, a "RoutingDomainID" is also specified.  While this is not a network address per-se, each collection of virtualized networks that will route between each other must have a unique administrator-defined Routing Domain ID.  Using the example above, the "Blue" subnet and "Red" subnet do not have traffic routed between each other and, as such, would each require a unique Routing Domain ID.

  3. Configure the Provider Address and Route records on Hyper-V Host 1 ( Host 1 Only )

    $NIC = Get-NetAdapter Ethernet

    New-NetVirtualizationProviderAddress -InterfaceIndex $NIC.InterfaceIndex -ProviderAddress "192.168.1.10" -PrefixLength 24

    New-NetVirtualizationProviderRoute -InterfaceIndex $NIC.InterfaceIndex -DestinationPrefix "0.0.0.0/0" -NextHop "192.168.1.1"

  4. Configure the Provider Address and Route records on Hyper-V Host 2 ( Host 2 Only )

    $NIC = Get-NetAdapter Ethernet

    New-NetVirtualizationProviderAddress -InterfaceIndex $NIC.InterfaceIndex -ProviderAddress "192.168.2.20" -PrefixLength 24

    New-NetVirtualizationProviderRoute -InterfaceIndex $NIC.InterfaceIndex -DestinationPrefix "0.0.0.0/0" -NextHop "192.168.2.1"

  5. Configure the Virtual Subnet ID on the Hyper-V Network Switch Ports for each "Blue" Virtual Machine on each Hyper-V Host ( Host 1 and Host 2 )

    Get-VMNetworkAdapter -VMName BlueVM1 | where {$_.MacAddress -eq "101010101105"} | Set-VMNetworkAdapter -VirtualSubnetID 6001

    Get-VMNetworkAdapter -VMName BlueVM2 | where {$_.MacAddress -eq "101010101107"} | Set-VMNetworkAdapter -VirtualSubnetID 6001

That's it! Once you've gone through these 5 steps, you should now be able to route traffic between Virtual Machines across virtual subnet 10.1.1.x/24.

Note: If Windows Firewall is enabled on the operating system within each Virtual Machine, you may need to configure Windows Firewall within each VM to allow the traffic you're using to test.  For example, to permit ping traffic between VM's with Windows Firewall enabled, you can use the following PowerShell 3.0 Cmdlets in each VM:

New-NetFirewallRule –DisplayName “Allow ICMPv4-In” –Protocol ICMPv4

New-NetFirewallRule –DisplayName “Allow ICMPv4-Out” –Protocol ICMPv4 –Direction Outbound

What's Next? Keep Going!

Below are some great resources to continue your learning process on Hyper-V Network Virtualization ...

How Are You Planning to Use Hyper-V Network Virtualization?

Have you found an interesting use case in your environment for Hyper-V Network Virtualization?  Be sure to share your story in the comments below!

HTH,

Keith

Build Your Lab! Build Your Lab! Download Windows Server 2012
Build Your Lab in the Cloud! Don’t Have a Lab? Build Your Lab in the Cloud with Windows Azure Virtual Machines
Join our "Early Experts" study group! Want to Get Certified? Join our Windows Server 2012 "Early Experts" Study Group

More Stories By Keith Mayer

Keith Mayer is a Technical Evangelist at Microsoft focused on Windows Infrastructure, Data Center Virtualization, Systems Management and Private Cloud. Keith has over 17 years of experience as a technical leader of complex IT projects, in diverse roles, such as Network Engineer, IT Manager, Technical Instructor and Consultant. He has consulted and trained thousands of IT professionals worldwide on the design and implementation of enterprise technology solutions.

Keith is currently certified on several Microsoft technologies, including System Center, Hyper-V, Windows, Windows Server, SharePoint and Exchange. He also holds other industry certifications from IBM, Cisco, Citrix, HP, CheckPoint, CompTIA and Interwoven.

Keith is the author of the IT Pros ROCK! Blog on Microsoft TechNet, voted as one of the Top 50 "Must Read" IT Blogs.

Keith also manages the Windows Server 2012 "Early Experts" Challenge - a FREE online study group for IT Pros interested in studying and preparing for certification on Windows Server 2012. Join us and become the next "Early Expert"!

@ThingsExpo Stories
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
The security devil is always in the details of the attack: the ones you've endured, the ones you prepare yourself to fend off, and the ones that, you fear, will catch you completely unaware and defenseless. The Internet of Things (IoT) is nothing if not an endless proliferation of details. It's the vision of a world in which continuous Internet connectivity and addressability is embedded into a growing range of human artifacts, into the natural world, and even into our smartphones, appliances, and physical persons. In the IoT vision, every new "thing" - sensor, actuator, data source, data con...
The Internet of Things promises to transform businesses (and lives), but navigating the business and technical path to success can be difficult to understand. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Sean Lorenz, Technical Product Manager for Xively at LogMeIn, demonstrated how to approach creating broadly successful connected customer solutions using real world business transformation studies including New England BioLabs and more.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Gridstore™, the leader in hyper-converged infrastructure purpose-built to optimize Microsoft workloads, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 16th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Gridstore™ is the leader in hyper-converged infrastructure purpose-built for Microsoft workloads and designed to accelerate applications in virtualized environments. Gridstore’s hyper-converged infrastructure is the industry’s first all flash version of HyperConverged Appliances that include both compute and storag...
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
An entirely new security model is needed for the Internet of Things, or is it? Can we save some old and tested controls for this new and different environment? In his session at @ThingsExpo, New York's at the Javits Center, Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, reviewed hands-on lessons with IoT devices and reveal a new risk balance you might not expect. Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, has more than nineteen years' experience managing global security operations and assessments, including a decade of leading incident response and digital forensics. He is co-author of t...
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
The 3rd International @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that it is now accepting Keynote Proposals. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the most profound change in personal and enterprise IT since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago. All major researchers estimate there will be tens of billions devices - computers, smartphones, tablets, and sensors - connected to the Internet by 2020. This number will continue to grow at a rapid pace for the next several decades.
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.
"There is a natural synchronization between the business models, the IoT is there to support ,” explained Brendan O'Brien, Co-founder and Chief Architect of Aria Systems, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at the 15th International Cloud Expo®, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
WebRTC defines no default signaling protocol, causing fragmentation between WebRTC silos. SIP and XMPP provide possibilities, but come with considerable complexity and are not designed for use in a web environment. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Matthew Hodgson, technical co-founder of the Matrix.org, discussed how Matrix is a new non-profit Open Source Project that defines both a new HTTP-based standard for VoIP & IM signaling and provides reference implementations.
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
There's Big Data, then there's really Big Data from the Internet of Things. IoT is evolving to include many data possibilities like new types of event, log and network data. The volumes are enormous, generating tens of billions of logs per day, which raise data challenges. Early IoT deployments are relying heavily on both the cloud and managed service providers to navigate these challenges. In her session at Big Data Expo®, Hannah Smalltree, Director at Treasure Data, discussed how IoT, Big Data and deployments are processing massive data volumes from wearables, utilities and other machines...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
DevOps Summit 2015 New York, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that it is now accepting Keynote Proposals. The widespread success of cloud computing is driving the DevOps revolution in enterprise IT. Now as never before, development teams must communicate and collaborate in a dynamic, 24/7/365 environment. There is no time to wait for long development cycles that produce software that is obsolete at launch. DevOps may be disruptive, but it is essential.
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.